The Nigerian digital space engulfed in a controversy that is evolving with fresh insights and increasing public attention. Central to this upheaval is Lucky Udu, a content creator who was once celebrated for his deeply moving interviews and philanthropic efforts.
However, Udu now finds himself facing serious accusations of manipulation, financial impropriety, and exploitation – claims that have gained momentum following statements from veteran musician Sky B.
This controversy dates back to early 2024, when Lucky Udu shared a viral interview featuring Sky B. The video depicted a touching story of a fallen star, struggling to survive and in dire need of public assistance.
The emotional resonance of the piece struck a chord with viewers, leading to an outpouring of donations from fans and supporters worldwide. For a brief moment, it appeared to be a tale of redemption.
However, the storyline took a dramatic twist. Months later, Udu published a follow-up video accusing Sky B of drug abuse and claiming that the artist had misused the donated money for narcotics. The response was swift and harsh. Sky B, who had remained quiet since the first interview, faced public condemnation without a chance to defend himself.
This all changed on September 30, 2025, when Sky B made a comeback in an interview released by Unclenasco.
In the footage, he categorically refuted the allegations and shifted the focus onto Lucky Udu. Sky B asserted that Udu had seized control of the donation channels and directed his sister to liquidate social media accounts established in Sky B’s name.
He alleged that money was withdrawn without his approval and that he was left behind once the content had fulfilled its purpose.
Sky B’s account as in the video above has sparked renewed examination of Lucky Udu’s methods.
GossipXpress conducted follow-up interviews with others who recounted similar experiences.
Numerous individuals described Udu’s interviews as somewhat scripted, with participants reportedly required to sign agreements prior to filming.
These agreements, as per sources, contained clauses that either mandated payment for the interview or transferred rights to donations and social media earnings to Udu’s foundation.
One unnamed participant characterized the experience as a “content scam,” stating,
“Lucky Udu appears to care, but once you share your story, you’re finished. He has more pressing matters to attend to, and you mean nothing to him.”
The repercussions have been considerable. Interaction on Lucky Udu’s social media channels has noticeably declined, and his brand – previously linked with compassion and advocacy – is now facing criticism for emotional exploitation and a lack of transparency.
New allegations have emerged, including accusations of inappropriate conduct, further tarnishing his public reputation.
Observers have started to draw comparisons between Lucky Udu and other digital activists, especially VeryDarkman, who is well-known for his transparency and responsibility.
Unlike Udu, VeryDarkman has regularly disclosed financial records and updates regarding donations. In contrast, Lucky has faced accusations of sidestepping such disclosures and addressing criticism with emotional responses instead of solid evidence.
As more individuals come forward, the perception of Lucky Udu is evolving. What was initially viewed as a beacon of hope and healing is now facing significant scrutiny.
Many are urging a formal investigation into his actions, calling for transparency and justice for those who feel taken advantage of in the name of content.
For the time being, the public remains vigilant, looking for clarity and accountability as the narrative continues to develop.
